Deliberation-Aware Responder in Multi-proposer Ultimatum Game
نویسندگان
چکیده
The article studies deliberation aspects by modelling a responder in multi-proposers ultimatum game (UG). Compared to the classical UG, deliberative multi-proposers UG suggests that at each round the responder selects the proposer to play with. Any change of the proposer (compared to the previous round) is penalised. The simulation results show that though switching of proposers incurred non-negligible deliberation costs, the economic profit of the deliberation-aware responder was significantly higher in multi-proposer UG compared to the classical UG.
منابع مشابه
Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.
In the Ultimatum Game, two players are offered a chance to win a certain sum of money. All they must do is divide it. The proposer suggests how to split the sum. The responder can accept or reject the deal. If the deal is rejected, neither player gets anything. The rational solution, suggested by game theory, is for the proposer to offer the smallest possible share and for the responder to acce...
متن کاملThe spatial ultimatum game.
In the ultimatum game, two players are asked to split a certain sum of money. The proposer has to make an offer. If the responder accepts the offer, the money will be shared accordingly. If the responder rejects the offer, both players receive nothing. The rational solution is for the proposer to offer the smallest possible share, and for the responder to accept it. Human players, in contrast, ...
متن کاملReinforcement and Directional Learning in the Ultimatum Game with Responder Competition
Demands in the Ultimatum Game in its traditional form with one proposer and one responder are compared with demands in an Ultimatum Game with responder competition. In this modified form one proposer faces three responders who can accept or reject the split of the pie. Initial demands in both ultimatum games are quite similar, however in the course of the experiment, demands in the ultimatum ga...
متن کاملChoices in Two-Person Interactions: The Effect of Amount and Social Distance on Offers in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games
Proposers in the Dictator Game and the Ultimatum Game often do not act as normative economic theory predicts. Offers are frequently higher than what would be considered income maximizing. The present study investigates two effects on the amount offered by the proposer. The first is whether the initial amount provided to the proposer systematically affects the amount offered (a magnitude effect)...
متن کاملEmpathy leads to fairness.
In the Ultimatum Game, two players are asked to split a prize. The first player, the proposer, makes an offer of how to split the prize. The second player, the responder, either accepts the offer, in which case the prize is split as agreed, or rejects it, in which case neither player receives anything. The rational strategy suggested by classical game theory is for the proposer to offer the sma...
متن کامل